Understanding the European Commission's Social Representation of the Western Balkans
Christos Marazopoulos, University of Bath
My paper approaches the initial construction of the Western Balkans by the European Commission via the utilisation of a constructivist framework of social representations. The paper starts from the assumption that international actors formulate social representations to understand reality. Actors make sense and formulate meanings of the world by anchoring their own structural features (identity, norms and past experiences) to the political subjects they are interested to develop substantial relations with. Following this, the actors (in this case, the European Commission) attempt to subsequently 'sell' their ideas and policies via social mechanisms (legitimation, appropriateness and institutionalisation). Adopting a macro-historical perspective, the investigation will begin from Yugoslavia and its close relation with the European Community which formed the basis to understand the Balkans in the 1990s. The paper identifies a representation of Yugoslavia by the European Commission as a sui generis representation closely affiliated with core European signifiers. This was reified in the transition period of 1989-91, where the Commission largely continued to discuss and reflect on Yugoslavia in the same terms despite the radical changes in the Eastern bloc. In the context of the Balkan Wars, the social representation of Yugoslavia rolled over and became attached not to its natural successor (SFRY), but to the other constituent republics, as the actual embodiments of Yugoslavia's 'European signifiers'. In the aftermath of the Dayton Accords, the emergence of an 'amorphous regional representation' - that of the Western Balkans - was depicted and elaborated on ideas and images previously utilised for Yugoslavia by the Commission.