Research Papers

In the theoretical part of this conference paper, I will focus on the positive potential that can emerge from an adequate representation of difference in the European Union. I argue that the representation of difference and the active input of difference (for example different foreign policy interests) into the system of EU external relations enables a complex system like that of EU external relations to find adequate and representative policy solutions. While the field of external relations is regarded as an executive domain, parliaments can make a difference and impact upon external relations in a positive manner Thus, the roles of national parliaments and the European Parliament could be substantial in the quest for greater legitimacy. In the empirical part of this paper, I will focus especially on the external relations of the European Union. Against the normative claim that parliaments could make a difference in legitimizing the EU’s external relations, we need to proof empirically if this is actually so. My empirical case studies will especially concentrate on the European Parliament. They will focus on the different roles of the EP in the field of external relations: the role of a “co-legislator” in trade-policy, the role of a “scrutinizer” in CFSP/CSDP and the role of a “diplomat” in its parliamentary diplomacy activities around the world.