An updated research programme is available in the right hand panel. UACES does not intent to make changes to this programme, but we may still need to make changes if paper‐givers withdraw from the conference.
Differentiation is one of the main features of European integration for the past two decades and is often hailed as an efficient tool to deepen integration in the face of a divergence of interests among Member States. However, it also poses some serious challenges to the durability and management of European integration, ranging from "the predominantly administrative (ensuring the more variegated polity is 'policed' effectively) to the legal (further challenges to the supremacy of EC law) and the normative (issues of democracy, as problems of reduced transparency and solidarity are evident)". Focussing on the democratic and managerial defects of differentiation post-decision-making, this paper assesses the role of the EP in evaluating European social and fiscal policies. In other words, what is the role of the EP in policy evaluation in a differentiated polity? Policy evaluation cross-cuts the gaps in the literature on differentiation both regarding policy implementation and the position of the EP in such a polity.
The abstracts and papers on this website reflect the views and opinions of the author(s). UACES cannot be held responsible for the opinions of others. Conference papers are works-in-progress - they should not be cited without the author's permission.