In recent years, since the onset of the Financial Crisis, the Court of Justice has shifted towards a far more re-strictive view of what categories of citizens may be entitled to social benefits in a host Member State. Alt-hough EU welfare law has always emphasised that economic activity is a primary precondition for accessing welfare payments and other social benefits, it has now actively began to demonstrate how severe the limits of this approach can be, particularly with regard to the economically-inactive citizen, who have increasingly been viewed by the CJEU as ‘welfare tourists’, i.e. individuals who travel from one Member State to another to take advantage of their more generous welfare provision. This paper will explore where this language has been most prevalent in the Court’s jurisprudence, as well as the inherent issues and implications of this approach.
The abstracts and papers on this website reflect the views and opinions of the author(s). UACES cannot be held responsible for the opinions of others. Conference papers are works-in-progress - they should not be cited without the author's permission.