Home > Conferences and Events > Calendar of Events > Limerick 2006 > Research Session 6
Exchanging Ideas on Europe 2006
Visions of Europe: Key
Problems, New Trajectories
UACES
36th Annual Conference and 11th Research
Conference
Research Session 6
UACES reserves the right at all times to make changes to the programme where necessary.
Session 1 | Session 2 | Session 3 | Session 4 | Session 5 | Session 6 | Full Programme
Saturday, 2 September (09:00-10:30)
The panels listed in the table below are followed by the abstracts for each of the papers.
|
Panel
Title:
Institutional Dynamics |
|
Panel
Title: Economic Aspects Chair: Benedicta Marzinotto (b.marzinotto@lse.ac.uk) Papers: Dierx/Ilzkovitz, May, Trouille |
|
Panel
Title: European Security and Defence Policy Chair: Aris Georgopoulos (a.georgopoulos@dundee.ac.uk) Papers: Lianos, Margaras, Petrov, Tsoukala/Georgopoulos |
|
Panel
Title: Foreign Policy and Power Chair: Steen Nielsen (sn.ikl@cbs.dk) Papers: Holden, Marchi, Ozer |
|
Panel
Title: Managing Multi-Level Relationships in the EU's External Commercial
Policies Chair: Michael Smith (m.h.smith@lboro.ac.uk) Papers: Gerlach, Tavornmas, Vichitsorasatra |
|
Panel
Title: Models of Integration Chair: Frands Pedersen (pedersf@wmin.ac.uk) Papers: Lazowski, Sepos |
|
Panel
Title: Regional Voices Chair: Ann Kennard (ann.kennard@uwe.ac.uk) Papers: Castro-Conde, Moore, Palmer |
|
Panel
Title: The View from Industry: Europe, Territory and Regulation Chair: Andy Smith (a.smith@sciencespobordeaux.fr) Papers: Carter/Smith, de Maillard, Itçaina/Cadiou |
Carter,
Caitriona
(University of Edinburgh)
Joint paper with Andy Smith
Regulatory Visions:
Comparing Two Industries of Fisheries and Wine
The
‘Better Regulation Strategy’ has a specific application in the fisheries and
wine sectors. Not only has it fuelled debates on policy instruments’
effectiveness, but also on levels at which decisions are taken –
decentralization for fisheries, centralization for wine. From both angles,
‘visions of Europe’ are deployed to improve ‘competitiveness’ and ‘problem
solving capacity’.
This paper compares the visions behind these processes as framed by actors
within two ‘regionalized’ industries: fisheries (Scotland), wine (Aquitaine).
Through the study of ‘top-down’ and ‘bottom-up’ regulatory strategies, we
identify the role which ideas in general – and representations of ‘territory’,
‘community’ and ‘sector-belonging’ in particular - play in the shaping and
taking of regulatory choices. In so doing, we lay emphasis on the multi-actor
institutionalized orders within which these decisions are made.
Consequently, the paper seeks to validate a clear theoretical standpoint.
Departing from conventional applications of multi-level governance, we develop a
specific approach which views changing regulatory processes as premised on a
dynamic logic that cannot be reduced to rational choice, cost-benefit
calculations or hierarchical imposition. Overall, we argue that the ‘political
assignment of authority’ is a process bounded by social representations of
contemporary markets, territory in general and ‘visions of Europe’ in
particular.
Castro-Conde, Cristina Ares
(University of Santiago de Copostela,
crisares@usc.es)
The Participation of the Regional Legislative
Assemblies in the ‘Early Warning System’: A Broken Toy or a Democratic Plus?
The
purpose of this article is to assess the potential role of regional legislative
assemblies under the Constitutional Treaty, both in terms of effectiveness and
democratic legitimacy. It argues that the operation of the “early warning
system” could have a very interesting side-effect in the democratic credentials
of the new European politeia in a way that was unintended when it was
designed within Working Group I on Subsidiarity at the Convention. This is due
to the paradoxical situation that the proper boundaries of the concrete design
of the EWS could contribute to narrow the connections between the European
Parliament, national parliaments and regional legislative assemblies, making the
reality of the European Union much more consistent with the theoretical metaphor
proposed by the advocates of multi-level governance. Furthermore, a broad
dialogue on subsidiarity as the one that could be opened by the new EWS can be
considered as an embryonic tool to involve representative institutions in a
process of governance beyond the nation-State with potential effects on
fostering public opinion on EU-related issues as well as an emerging European
identity. The extension of the principle of subsidiarity to regions in a
European multi-level system of governance in which both unity and diversity are
considered essential values could be a powerful device to manage the permanent
trade-off between centralisation and decentralisation and, indeed, effectiveness
and democracy.
de
Maillard, Jacques
(University of Rouen)
Ambivalent Visions of Regulatory
Europe: The Case of Wine in the Bordelais and the Languedoc
This paper
analyses the effects of ‘top down’ processes of change in the regulation of the
European wine industry. The paper shows how the political impact of European
regulation contrasts between two French wine-producing areas - Bordeaux and
Languedoc - with emphasis laid on the varying visions of the ‘EU as a
regulatory state’ as constructed by professional leaders in these areas.
In the Languedoc,
the perceived de-regulatory content of EU policy sparked violent mobilisations
of the profession in the 1970s. Since then, and through investing in processes
of negotiation at the European level, some Languedocian professional leaders
have become socialised to invest politically in the EU as a level of regulation.
As a result, the EU is viewed in more complex and regulatory empowering ways. By
contrast, in Bordeaux, although professional leaders initially welcomed the
perceived de-regulatory European arena as an alternative to the ‘excessive
centralisation’ of French wine policy, changed actor visions of (re-)regulation
are now not seen to resonate in EU level discourse.
Deploying the conceptual tool of the EU as a multi-arena (not multi-level)
polity, the paper analyses the role of representations in the way actors develop
competences to engage in the EU’s decision-making processes.
Dierx , Adriaan
(European Commission,
adriaan.dierx@cec.eu.int)
Joint paper with Fabienne Ilzkovitz
The Internal Market and the Innovative
Performance of the European Economy
The Internal Market project, which was initiated in the mid-1980s
with the publication of the White Paper on the Single Market Programme,
signalled the end of a period of euro-pessimism associated with the political,
economic and monetary crises of the 1970s and early 1980s. It opened up
perspectives for restoring confidence, increasing competition and improving the
competitiveness of European enterprises. Expected gains from increased trade and
cross-border investment combined with economies of scale in production have been
realised to a significant extent, even if market integration in the services
sector is yet incomplete and barriers continue to hinder cross-border
activities. However, these gains have been mostly static in nature, resulting in
a one-off increase in living standards. Dynamic gains from the Internal Market
have been more difficult to achieve. Such gains had been expected to result from
the increased competitive pressures in the Internal Market, which would provide
incentives for firms to invest in research and innovation. While this
transmission mechanism appears to work for firms close to the technology
frontier, it is inactive for a majority of enterprises. This paper reviews the
different incentives for firms to engage in innovative activities and explores
ways in which a re-defined Internal Market strategy might influence such
incentives in order to increase the dynamism of the European economy.
Gerlach, Carina
(Loughborough University,
c.gerlach@lboro.ac.uk)
The EU and the GATS: Decreasing Returns on Power
Investments
This paper focuses on the question of ‘how does the EU govern trade
in services within the global political economy?’ and places it within two
central conceptual spaces: power in international organizations and multilateral
governance of trade through the WTO.
The lack of governance in the “new trade issues” in the GPE, such as
international trade in services, creates a window of opportunity for actors to
shape the respective regimes. The necessary precondition for an actor to do so
is the possession of structural power and the capability to operationalise this
power on the multilateral, the interregional and the bilateral level.
The EU has postulated the WTO as the core forum for the pursuit of its
multilateral trade policy and for establishing frameworks for trade in services.
Hence, the paper examines how far and in what ways the EU has been able to
mobilise its structural power in the WTO in order to shape the regime according
to its own model and according to its own material and normative interests.
It will be argued that the power shift in the WTO (which became visible in the
1999 Seattle Ministerial) has rendered the WTO into an institution where the EU
has increasing difficulties in pursuing its agenda with regard to trade in
services. As other levels of governance promise increasing returns on “power
investment”, EU policy might shift.
Häge, Frank (Leiden
University,
fhaege@fsw.leidenuniv.nl)
Bureaucratic Discretion in the Council of the European Union: Decision-Making by
Diplomats and National Officials
Much of the
research on EU decision-making still treats member states as unitary actors and
focuses exclusively on the impact of formal institutional provisions. Most works
abstract from the fact that the Council takes legislative decisions on different
hierarchical levels and that the majority of these decisions are not taken by
ministers but by diplomats and national officials. This paper examines the
conditions under which legislative decisions are made by bureaucrats rather than
ministers in the Council. Precise theories about the role of bureaucrats in
Council negotiations and empirical tests based on a large number of cases are
still missing. In both respects, this paper makes a contribution. First, a
theoretical model of Council decision-making and bureaucratic discretion is
developed. The main implications are that bureaucratic discretion is influenced
by the workload of ministers, the interest ministers have in the issue in
question, and, indirectly, the number of member states. In the second part,
these hypotheses are scrutinized through a statistical analysis with ‘Council
decision-making level’ as the dependent variable. This analysis is based on a
random sample of legislative proposals transmitted to the Council between
January 2000 and December 2004.
Holden, Patrick
(University of Plymouth,
patrick.holden@plymouth.ac.uk)
In Search of Structural Power: The European
Union’s Efforts to Forge a Euro-Mediterranean Space
The
concepts of civilian power and normative power are most commonly applied to the
EU’s external relations, which has also been described as a form of ‘structural
foreign policy’. However, it is posited here that many of the EU’s external
activities can be usefully understood as an effort to develop its structural
power. While not excluding normative considerations, it is argued that many
policy instruments, from aid and trade agreements to institutional cooperation,
are attempting to shape global politics in terms favourable to European
commercial and strategic interests. The Mediterranean is a case in point where,
although inspired mainly by security concerns, EU policy is geared towards
bringing the EU’s neighbours into its orbit and its rule system. This is most
obvious in terms of the European Neighbourhood Policy. It is, of course, not at
all clear that the EU has the wherewithal to accomplish its goals. In
particular, reforming the economic and political institutions is a formidable
challenge. Nevertheless, if one postulates the objective of structural power,
rather than more normative objectives, the EU’s policies may be more cohesive
and effective than meets the eye. This paper tests this hypothesis through a
holistic evaluation of the EU’s role in the Mediterranean.
Itçaina,
Xabier
Joint paper with Stéphane Cadiou
Sectoral Issues and Environmental Causes: French
Basque Fishermen, The Prestige and a Double-edged Perception of Europe
This paper analyzes the mobilization of French Basque fishermen
following the wreck of The Prestige off the coast of Spain in 2002. This
environmental crisis triggered extensive political action and ‘bottom-up’
mobilization in the French Basque region, with the local territory providing
fertile ground for political protest against local, national and EU political
actors and institutions.
This paper considers the impact this crisis had on the fisheries
sector, which since the 1990s has undergone significant transformation, a trend
partly attributed to the rules of the EU’s Common Fisheries Policy. The
Prestige crisis thus brought about the mobilization of a profession already
undergoing a structural crisis and re-opened debates on regulation. Two
competing perceptions of future Europeanization as revealed by this crisis are
considered: an industry awareness of the European dimension of environmental
issues vs. that of a strong regulatory European framework for the fish
industry.
The case-study takes as its focus the representation by the profession of the EU
as a source of regulation and the participation of professional actors in the
multi-level governance of the sector. In so doing, the paper analyses processes
of multi-level governance through the (re)situation of collective action and
public policy in a professional milieu.
Lazowski, Adam
(University of Westminster,
a.lazowski@wmin.ac.uk)
European Economic Area: Disappearing Hybrid or
Sustainable
Enterprise?
The European
Economic Area was tailored in order to establish a common economic space between
the 12 Member States of the European Communities and 7 EFTA countries. Although
its creation was preceded by numerous drawbacks, including rejection of the
Agreement by one of its signatories, the EEA has proved during its first decade
to be a well functioning hybrid.
It is argued that in the course of last decade the European Economic
Area has successfully played a double role. For some EFTA countries it has
served as an anti-chamber on their way to the EU membership. Complex sets of
political and economic motives had pushed Sweden, Finland and Austria to the EU
in 1995. For the other EFTA EEA countries this framework has proved to be a long
term solution without, at the same time, formally excluding their potential
future accession to the European Union. Their decision to remain outside the
European Union is driven by a combination of political and economic factors.
This is especially the case with Norway and Iceland where anti EU-movements are
benefiting from public support. In case of the latter not the electorates
themselves but rather political elites are considered to be very Euro-sceptic.
One should not forget that Norwegians have already twice rejected in nationwide
referenda the membership of the European Communities/European Union. At the same
time Iceland has never expressed a desire to accede. In economic terms the
fisheries policy and the energy resources are the decisive factors. Also, the
‘loss of sovereignty’ argumentation plays a considerable role in the public
debate. It is particularly astonishing as with the EU accession both countries
will gain access to decision-making machinery while within the EEA framework
they are technically obliged to swallow majority of the EC acquis without
a real participation in its adoption. The key question is whether the EEA is a
sustainable enterprise or the EFTA countries would be more beneficial from Swiss
model arrangements based on a series of bilateral treaties. There are definitely
numerous arguments supporting both scenarios. Moreover, EEA is slowly emerging
as a potential model for EU relations with its close neighbourhood. So the
question is whether European Economic Area is a hybrid, which days are counted
or rather developing project with some potential ahead.
Lianos, Paraschos
(University of Leicester, pl50@le.ac.uk)
ESDP and Strategic Culture; A Study on the Feasibility of a European Strategic
Mono-culture
A holistic
approach in the study of the emergence of a European strategic culture
represents major dilemmas. First, the EU is not a clearly defined actor in terms
of security policy-making; it is not a state in the Westphalia sense and so far
has pursued military policies usually pursued by international organisations. In
addition, the study on the feasibility of a homogenous European strategic
culture should aim to address the fact that the EU and the institutional
underpinnings of ESDP are based on a clash of intergovernmental and federal
pursuits. As such, I will pursue my study based on the hypothesis that the EU is
a single state and I will try to explore the different strands of strategic
culture that could have been represented for such a state. Following the
scenario that the pursuit and implementation of ESDP has been successful, and
with the EU acting as a federal state I will employ the Booth-Macmillan
framework, created to analyse the strategic culture for single states and amend
variables where necessary to apply it to the EU as a case-study. The aim of the
paper will not focus on a conclusive analysis of future developments but rather
as an insight on the processes and development of a European strategic culture.
Marchi, Ludovica
(University of Reading,
lmbr4@compuserve.com)
Stepping Towards an FPA Model
This
paper draws together a few recent analytical frameworks set up by foreign policy
analysts to explore member states' national foreign policy in the EU. The
question of how to examine the latter is central to our understanding of the
role of states within the political structures in Europe because national
foreign policy is not a priori seen as a residue left by the EU foreign
policy system or a result of adaptation, but as an analytical level in its own
right with its own dynamics. Insights into definitions of foreign policy,
variables underpinning foreign policy models, and the contributions of Larsen
(2005), White (2001), Tonra (2001) and Manners and Whitman (2000) to this area
of study constitute the body of this paper. Seeking to standardise
methodological enquiries into EU states' foreign policy in the Union is an
important task. However the paper argues that each case of national foreign
policy's relations with the EU/CFSP and the EC/EPC
is a typical one, and that an FPA framework which questions the ties at the
European level of member state's foreign policy to the point that it can explain
the distinctiveness and uniqueness of that state's policy is hard to put in
place.
Margaras, Vasilis
(Loughborough University,
v.margaras@lboro.ac.uk)
From Amorphous Networks to Integrated Communities? An Analysis of the
Development of ESDP
The paper
provides an account of pre- and post ESDP formation by using the framework of
communities and networks. It is argued that a cohesive historic study of the
post Cold War period is necessary in order to explain the basic motivation
forces behind the emergence of ESDP. However, most historic studies have focused
on important historic decisions thus neglecting the continuous interaction
between members of various groups such as epistemic communities and policy
networks. The paper addresses this problem by providing a framework of ESDP
development. The study framework covers the period ranging from 1990 to 2004. I
suggest that policy networks and epistemic communities have been empowered by
the creation of ESDP institutions as they have both benefited from the creation
of ‘stable spaces of interaction’. However, epistemic communities and policy
networks have also been affected by the ‘endogenous’ forces of ESDP and have
been internally transformed into more cohesive ‘tightly coupled’ networks.
May, Justin
(University of Michigan,
jbmay@umich.edu)
Trade and Migration in an Enlarged European Union: A Spatial Analysis
One of the most
prominent features in the evolution of the European Union has been its
geographical expansion. Since its beginning as a six-country, three-good common
market, the European Union has grown into a customs union and common market
spanning 25 countries, more than 450 million citizens, and countless goods and
services. Using a dynamic computable general equilibrium approach, this paper
seeks to quantify the long-run effects of the most recent expansion and likely
further expansions on both inter- and intra-national flows of trade and labor.
Underlying the
simulations is a spatial model of the European Union that incorporates
heterogeneous firms, trade in differentiated products, iceberg trade costs, and
many potential locations. Locations are populated by a large number of potential
firms and these firms employ labor that varies across countries in its relative
skill. The dynamics of the model are such that unprofitable firms are forced to
exit in the long run, and workers have the opportunity to migrate in response to
gradients in real compensation. A novel feature of the data set used here is
that locations are defined in a very precise way, and the simulations take as
their starting point the actual distribution of economic activity across the
European landmass. Because of the precision with which locations are defined, I
am able to draw conclusions about the impact of enlargement at a very
disaggregated level. The model is calibrated to match both the macroeconomic
results of the 1995 enlargement as well as microeconomic evidence on exporter
size and productivity.
Mineshima-Lowe, Dale
(dalemineshima@yahoo.com)
Parliamentary Scrutiny of EU Criminal Law in
Britain
It is widely
acknowledged that involvement of national parliaments in legislative activities
of the European Union is of great importance for ensuring democratic legitimacy
and compatibility at the member state level. In practice, involvement by member
states has varied dependent on interests and impact, amongst other reasons. At
a general level, members of the British Parliament have acknowledged the
necessity for further scrutiny and debate on EU legislation at an earlier stage,
but has this been the norm in practice?
In the area of
criminal law, member states have seen recent moves made by the European Union
towards developing itself within this sphere. This paper focuses upon the
criminal law area, as it has traditionally been considered to be tied to
national sovereignty. It considers Westminster’s performance and role in
scrutinising third pillar measures such as those decisions on the European
Arrest Warrant and on combating terrorism. The paper examines the operations
and parliamentary procedures through which European Union criminal law measures
are incorporated into British law and the extent to which scrutiny of such
measures are done at the national level prior to agreement upon them at the JHA
Council level.
Moore, Carolyn
(University of Birmingham,
c.s.moore@bham.ac.uk)
Advertising Space? Polish and Czech Regional Representations in Brussels
Regional
representation in
Brussels is a
burgeoning phenomenon. A regional office in
Brussels
now the norm for any sub-national unit of an EU member state. Even prior to
enlargement, regional actors from candidate countries have been motivated to
mobilise in
Brussels, establishing a permanent base or representation. Whilst the emergence
of regions as functional units of territorial self-governance in Central and
Eastern Europe was catalysed largely by the requirements of EU regional
policies, this paper provides substantive evidence regarding the engagement of
these regions with broader European policy issues.
A model of
regional representation from “old” member states only emerged over time, with a
funds-seeking role gradually being superseded by a sharp focus on policy issues.
Regions from new member states have adopted and deployed this model in its
optimum form; through learning from best practice, strategic networking and
partnership-building efforts, regions from new member states have emerged as
some of the euro-savviest players within the regional office network in
Brussels, deploying resources to maximum effect. More than just profile-raising
offices for their home regions, these offices engage in and influence broad
policy debates, over and beyond those connected to the structural funds.
O’Mahony, Jane
(University of Kent,
j.a.o'mahony@kent.ac.uk)
Joint paper with Brigid Laffan
Managing
Europe:
Critical Junctures and the Increasing Formalisation of the Irish Core Executive
This paper analyses the management of European Union (EU) business by the Irish
core executive. More specifically, it investigates the demands placed by EU
membership on the Irish system of public administration and how the system has
responded to these demands. Employing an institutionalist analytical framework,
the paper maps the formal and informal organisational and procedural devices or
structures used to manage EU affairs in Ireland, as well as dissecting the key
relationships that govern this management process and the role of the domestic
agents actively involved in the EU’s governance structure, the cadre or
boundary managers. The paper also explores in a dynamic way the development of
the capacity for the management of EU affairs in Ireland over time. Using the
concepts of path dependency and critical junctures, we illuminate how key
system-management decisions became locked-in over time and we isolate the
triggers for significant adaptational change, be they domestic or external. In
the empirical analysis, we learn that EU business in
Ireland
has been managed with strong ministerial autonomy, a coordinating role for the
foreign ministry and traditionally weak processes of interdepartmental
coordination and communication. Adaptation, when it occurred, was
path-dependent and consisted of gradual incremental adjustment. This system of
flexible adaptation generally served
Ireland
well as the EU’s policy regime expanded and evolved, but in response to the
shock rejection of the Nice Treaty by the electorate in 2001, significant
formalisation of the Irish system occurred with the establishment of new
processes and rules for managing relations between the core executive and the EU.
Ozer, Yonca
(Marmara
University,
oncaozer@marmara.edu.tr)
Normative Power
Europe
and the Relations with
Turkey
The EU is an
unusual kind of actor not only in its own institutional structure, but also in
its external relations. It does not primarily rely on military means to
influence international relations, and does not seem to follow first and
foremost geopolitical interests in its external policy. Instead, it pursues
policies leading to the spread of particular norms and the promotion of values
with a view to securing a democratic and peaceful environment in which it acts.
The EU’s enlargement policy is an external policy field in which the mechanism
of conditionality is frequently used to persuade the governments of candidate
countries to pursue policies that promote and protect democracy and human
rights. The EU’s relations with Turkey as a candidate country constitute the
most striking example in this respect. The paper looks at the ‘normative power
Europe’ discourse from the perspective of EU-Turkey relations in order to
demonstrate whether and to what extent the EU is ‘normative power’. The aim of
the paper is to analyse both the impact of the EU conditionality on the ongoing
political reform process in Turkey and the role that the EU’s relations with
Turkey
play in the ‘normative power Europe’ discourse.
Palmer, Rosanne
(Cardiff University,
palmerr@cardiff.ac.uk)
A
Role for Regional Parliaments in EU Policy-Making? A Comparative Perspective
The objective
of the proposed paper is to consider the impact of European integration upon
‘regional’ legislatures in EU Member States. In a number of federal or
decentralised Member States, regional parliaments have, or have developed,
significant legislative powers. The exercise of such powers has, inevitably,
been affected by the European integration process. Drawing upon material from
Austria, Germany and the UK, this paper aims to explore the implications of
European integration for the core functions of regional legislatures and the
constraints that these parliaments and assemblies face in seeking to engage with
the EU decision-making process and in scrutinising the EU-related activities of
their respective executives. The paper will build upon an analytical framework
drawn from the experiences of national parliaments in the EU in the expectation
that concerns about parliamentary engagement at state level will also resonate
at the regional level. The concerns faced by national parliaments are
potentially multiplied for regional legislatures when their position in the
European policy process is considered, given that they are considered “actors of
the second order”.
Petrov, Peter
(University of Manchester,
pietro_bg@yahoo.com)
The Governance of the European Security and Defence Policy: Governance
Capability and Policy Effectiveness
This research
paper analyses the institutionalisation of the European Security and Defence
Policy (ESDP) and particularly the performance of its governance machinery
during the phase of policy implementation.
ESDP emerged as one
of the EU common policies after the Treaty of Maastricht, which put into force
the Common Foreign and Security Policy and stipulated the gradual framing of a
European Defence Policy. The practical steps towards its institutionalisation
were taken only after the Franco-British bilateral summit in St. Malo (1998).
Yet the institutional knowledge and ideas, which were put into practice, did not
appear in 1998 but came from a wider tradition of European foreign and security
policy cooperation. The paper aims at analysing the performance of the ESDP
regime of governance and more specifically the governance capability of its
institutional arrangements in the context of the first two completed EU-led
military operations: ‘Artemis’ in Congo and ‘Concordia’ in Macedonia. In
explaining the development of the ESDP regime of governance
the research
is underpinned theoretically by the
analytical toolkit of the
historical institutionalist approach. Additionally
in assessing the ESDP
governance capability the research draws upon and applies methods derived from
the public policy and especially on policy implementation and government
capability.
Sepos, Angelos
(University of Cyprus,
asepos@gmail.com)
Differentiated Integration: A Motor or Brake for European Integration?
The paper examines the relationship between Europeanization and Differentiated
Integration. In an enlarged Union, forms of differentiated integration are
increasingly becoming more popular as they provide the tools for willing and
able Member States to integrate further in areas of their choice. Yet, such
initiatives have also alarmed a large number of Member States who fear that such
actions may not only marginalize them, but also lead up to a transformation or
even disintegration of the European Union.
In light of these developments, the paper will address the following questions:
What is the relationship between Europeanization, European integration,
political unification and differentiated integration? Has Europeanization
contributed to the emergence of differentiated integration in the EU? Is
Europeanization in harmony or in contradiction with the notion of differentiated
integration? Is differentiated integration a result of a conscious strategy from
Member States or of random pressures and events in the integration process? Is
differentiated integration a brake in the integration process or a tool for
furthering that process? Can differentiated integration be the political
solution to the EU’s dilemma between deepening and widening? Which form of
differentiated integration can be a motor for integration? What is the impact of
differentiated integration on the new/old, small/large Member States in an
enlarged Union? Are there any alternatives to differentiated integration, as a
means to manage diversity within the Union?
Tavornmas, Ajaree
(Loughborough University,
a.tavornmas@lboro.ac.uk)
The EU’s Commercial and Business Engagement Strategies towards Asia: A
Multi-Level Approach
This paper
examines the EU’s commercial relations with Asia (in this case, South East Asia
and North East Asia), with a particular focus on the the formation and
implementation of the EU’s commercial strategies at three different levels –
transregional (Asia-Europe Meeting - ASEM), interregional (EU-Association of
Southeast Asian Nations - ASEAN) relations and bilateral (EU-Thailand)
relations. It argues that since the mid-1990s the pursuit of business engagement
has emerged as part of the broad framework of the EU’s commercial diplomacy
towards Asia, and illustrates the ways in which this has been pursued at the
three levels.
The paper aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the strategies
pursued, instruments used and roles played by the EU in Asia. It concludes that
significant variations in the patterns of the EU commercial engagement in Asia
can be observed and that the EU has different strategies and instruments,
performs different roles, and attempts to engage different commercial
stakeholders at these three distinctive but interconnected levels. This raises
questions relating to the effective management of such multi-level
relationships.
Trouille, Jean-Marc
(University of Bradford,
j.m.l.trouille@bradford.ac.uk)
Creating Industrial ‘Champions’ in
Europe?
An Analysis of Franco-German Inter-Firm Linkages
Over the last
three years, numerous discussions have taken place between Berlin and Paris
about speeding up Franco-German industrial cooperation and intensifying the
amalgamation of businesses between the two countries, with a view to creating
the ‘Airbuses of tomorrow’, i.e. European champions able to compete on an equal
footing with American and Asian giants.
However, this approach is not always compatible with EU competition and
industrial policies, which want European champions to constitute themselves
without state interference. Moreover, the Sanofi-Aventis affair, the
recapitalisation of Alstom without involving Siemens, and the recent
Franco-German power struggle within EADS have highlighted an industrial
nationalism which favours national champions rather than European ones and is
hardly compatible with EU policies.
This paper focuses on the two EU Member states which have retained the largest
manufacturing base. After considering the main divergences between Brussels,
Paris and Berlin with regard to creating European champions, this paper examines
an extensive recent research on all inter-firm linkages established across the
Rhine since 1990. It then assesses the impact of state interventions among these
linkages and argues that cross-national industrial alliances are more likely to
be successful when these respond to a business logic rather than to
government-led political strategies.
Tsoukala, Katerina
(University of Sussex,
a.tsoukala@sussex.ac.uk)
Joint paper with Aris Georgopoulos
European Armament Policy: Difficulties and Alternatives
The relationship between the European Armaments Policy and the credibility of
the European Security and Defence Policy is undeniable. It suffices to remember
that the establishment of the latter (or at the very least its timing) was
linked directly with the European embarrassment during the Kosovo intervention,
where the huge capabilities gap between the US and Europe was revealed.
The purpose of this paper is twofold.
Firstly it examines the inherent factors that render the establishment of a
European Armaments Policy a challenging exercise. These factors include the
occasional divergence (actual or perceived) of security concerns between Member
States, the absence of an open European defence procurement market, the
differences in defence industrial capacities among Member States (“Big” v
“Small”) and the issue of protectionism in its various forms (lack of market
access and offsets-juste retour).
Secondly it attempts a preliminary assessment of the recent developments in the
area such as the establishment of the intergovernmental European Defence Agency
and the adoption of the Code of Conduct for European Defence Procurement which
constitutes a soft law instrument. In this respect the paper examines the
possibilities for alternative methods of Governance in an area so inextricably
linked with security and defence.
Vichitsorasatra, Natee
(Loughborough University,
n.vichitsorasatra@lboro.ac.uk)
Bilateralism and Multilateralism: A Balancing Act for Material and Ideational
‘Cooperation’ between the EU and
East Asia
This paper contends that rise and decline in the EU-East Asia trade cooperation
process is identifiable by the manner in which a bilateral or multilateral mode
of cooperation arises. Rational choice, social constructivism, and Robert
Axelrod’s work on the evolution of cooperation is drawn upon to indicate how the
mode of cooperation may depend largely on the partners’ preference for material
and ideational values. Both material and ideational factors involved in
bilateralism or multilateralism appear to have determined how the partners
“cooperate” or “defect”.
A comparative
study of the EU’s trade relationship with Japan, Korea, and China is used to
illustrate how both material and ideational values influence the bilateral and
multilateral modes of cooperation. There is evidence that the relationships
contain elements of both material and ideational values as well as policy choice
in shifting between bilateralism and multilateralism.
These studies will draw from institutional policy-making choices,
trade data, historical highlights, and key European Commission strategic
documents to identify the values involved in the relationship and to analyse how
this may have affected the bilateralism and multilateralism. The paper finally
draws conclusions on how cooperation may have “evolved” in each of the EU-East
Asian relationships.
Last modified:
Monday, 21 August 2006
idD410601ProgrammeR6 +16Feb2006
©UACES 2006