Home > Conferences and Events > Calendar of Events > Limerick 2006 > Research Session 3
Exchanging Ideas on Europe 2006
Visions of Europe: Key
Problems, New Trajectories
UACES
36th Annual Conference and 11th Research
Conference
Research Session 3
UACES reserves the right at all times to make changes to the programme where necessary.
Session 1 | Session 2 | Session 3 | Session 4 | Session 5 | Session 6 | Full Programme
Friday, 1 September (14:00-15:30)
The panels listed in the table below are followed by the abstracts for each of the papers.
|
Panel
Title: EMU I |
|
Panel
Title: Enlargement Beyond EU(25): 'New' Directions and new Dynamics? Chair: Nieves Pérez-Solórzano (n.perez-solorzano@uea.ac.uk) Papers: Icener, McGrattan, Phinnemore |
|
Panel
Title: EU Gender Law and Policy Chair: Tamara Hervey (tamara.hervey@nottingham.ac.uk) Papers: Beveridge, Shaw, Pfister |
|
Panel
Title: Even Rules, Uneven Practices Chair: Stijn Smismans (stijn.smismans@soc.unitn.it) Papers: Berglund, Bugdahn, Treib/Falkner/Hartlapp |
|
Panel
Title: External Relations II Chair: Amelia Hadfield (aeah@kent.ac.uk) Papers: Oikonomou, Olsen, Rees |
|
Panel
Title: Political Values in the New Europe Chair: Giselle Bosse (gib@aber.ac.uk) Papers: Bogutcaia/Bosse/Schmidt-Felzmann, Furusawa, Hutcheson, White/Korosteleva |
|
Panel
Title: States in the EU Chair: Nick Startin (nicholas.startin@uwe.ac.uk) Papers: Koelling, Langer |
|
Panel
Title: Supporting the EU: New Directions and New Research Chair: Michelle Cini (michelle.cini@bris.ac.uk) Papers: Edwards, Guerra, Savkova |
Berglund, Sara
(Utrecht University,
s.k.berglund@fss.uu.nl)
Problems with Implementing European Public Utilities Directives: Domestic
Opposition or Administrative Ineffectiveness?
In the area of
public utilities, the EU member states have agreed on ambitious policies to open
up markets for competition and to regulate these markets. To have the expected
effect, these policies have to be implemented effectively. However, current
research indicates that this is problematic; difficulties appear already in the
first step of transposing the directives into national legislation.
In the literature, political explanations of problems with transposition are
currently gaining ground. In this paper, however, it is argued that while
political explanations are relevant under certain conditions, administrative
explanations have more leverage. This is elaborated on in a theoretical
framework based on sociological institutionalism and implementation theory. It
is argued that lengthy legal and administrative procedures can cause problems
with transposition, and perhaps more importantly, that a number of variables,
such as capacity and priority, matter at each step in the process.
This framework is applied to an original quantitative data set including all
utilities directives and their transposition in five member states. To obtain a
more complete picture of the process, this data is combined with qualitative
data regarding a limited number of directives.
Bethge, Jan-Alexander
(Georg-August-University,
Göttingen
jbethge@uni-goettingen.de)
Joint paper with Renate Ohr
Current-Account Matters on the way to EMU: The Transfer Problem Re-revisited
“Standard &
Poor’s” recent downgrade of Hungary’s long-term creditworthiness was accompanied
by a forecast that the country may not adopt the Euro before 2014. In public
statements S&P referred to upward macroeconomic risks resulting from rapidly
growing fiscal deficits and subsequent high current-account deficits. However,
in CEEC budget deficits sometimes turn out to be highly volatile, while
persistent external deficits are a common phenomenon. So far policy discussions
have largely ignored the current-account balance as an important criterion for
the timing of Euro adoption. Hence, our central questions are: Do sustained
current-account deficits matter for the pace of monetary integration? And, if
so, how? Modern research on the classical transfer problem affirms that creditor
countries will eventually face a real depreciation in the longer run, while
current-account reversals may occur even in the short run. Since large swings in
the real exchange rate must be considered as an adverse precondition for
monetary integration, our aim is to specify the significance of the transfer
problem. In this respect important issues are: (1) the relevance of the
twin-deficit proposition, (2) cyclical versus structural factors of
current-account deficits, (3) the degree, composition, development, and
macroeconomic effects of external debt.
Beveridge, Fiona
(University of Liverpool,
f.c.beveridge@liv.ac.uk)
Building Against the Past: The Impact of Mainstreaming on EU Gender Law and
Policy
This article
examines the record of the European Commission in acting out its commitment to
gender mainstreaming, in particular through an examination of outputs in the
period 1995-2005. A central focus of the paper is the contribution of
mainstreaming activities to EU gender equality law and policy. The paper
concludes that mainstreaming has helped to widen the focus of Community gender
policy, develop new tools and capacities and to push equality policy from the
Commission down into Member States, particularly in areas governed by the Open
Method of Co-ordination. Mainstreaming activities have also made distinctive
contributions to the ‘vision’ of gender equality pursued by the European
Commission.
Bogutcaia,
Galina
Joint paper with
Anke
Schmidt-Felzmann and Giselle Bosse
Lost in Translation? Political Elites and the Interpretative Values Gap in
European Neighbourhood Policies
This paper will
examine the role of ‘European values’ in recent relations between the European
Union and its neighbours, with a particular focus on EU- Moldovan and EU-
Russian relations. Based on the assumption that ‘European values’ are social
constructs constituted through speech acts, interpretations of ‘European values’
in official policy and communications of the EU and of political elites in the
neighbouring states will be examined. It is argued that that there is a
significant gap between interpretations of ‘European values’ articulated by the
EU and correspondent interpretations by political elites in Moldova and Russia
respectively. This ‘interpretative values gap’ needs to be addressed by the EU
as a matter of urgency, in order to ensure the successful implementation of its
recent neighbourhood policies.
Bugdahn, Sonja
(German Research
Institute for Public Administration, Speyer,
bugdahn@foev-speyer.de)
Travelling to Brussels via Aarhus or from Network
Governance to Governing with Networks
Despite the
fact that European governance has been described as network governance for more
than a decade, there are very few studies on supportive cross-national
implementation networks at the EU level, their functions and different
compositions. As a starting point, this paper conceptualizes implementation of
EU policies as taking place in loosely coupled arenas. It then discusses the
strengths and weaknesses of governmental and non-governmental networks in
providing for more coherence between fragmented arenas. NGO networks may provide
interfaces between sub-national implementation arenas and the EU implementation
and policy review arena. However, sub-national arenas remain to a large degree
autonomous, while infringement and review procedures remain dominated by the
European Commission and EU member states.
To circumvent
these actors, NGOs can shop for different arenas in which precedents for EU
policy-making can be set. Based on this framework, the role of the Stichting
Natuur en Milieu (SNM) network in the implementation and review of the 1990
Access to Environmental Information Directive is explored.
Edwards, Sobrina
(University of Sussex,
sre22@sussex.ac.uk)
Crisis? What Crisis?: The EUropean Institutions
and the Concept of Public Support
A reoccurring theme in the debate over EUropean Union integration is
the extent to which there now exists a legitimacy crisis and more fundamentally,
how this ‘crisis’ can be overcome. Central to this discussion – is the idea of
a post-national political community and the kind of ‘relationship’ EUrope and
the EUropeans should legitimately enjoy. The phenomenon of the ‘risky
referendum’ and relatively weak levels of public support for EUrope have led
some authors to argue that there is now an ever increasing ‘gap in the making’
between the elite and public (s) visions of the EUropean project. This paper
addresses this debate via an exploration of EUropean institutional discourse
centred on the concept of public support as a problematic beginning in the
1970’s. It employs a discourse theoretical analysis to consider the ways in
which the concept of public support has been constructed and reconstructed, both
in anticipation and as a response to a series of crisis that has befit the
EUropean project. In doing so, it will show that ‘crisis’ is always accommodated
within EUropean institutional discourse and the legitimacy of the EUropean
project as potentially ‘a political community in the making’ is never
fundamentally questioned. By way of a conclusion, this paper will then consider
how this evolving discourse challenges and reinforces key assumptions in the
academic debate regarding legitimacy, identity and public support.
Furusawa, Katsuto
(University of Glasgow,
k.furusawa.1@research.gla.ac.uk)
Participation and Protest in the EU and the ‘Outsiders’
The border
between the EU and the ‘outsiders’ may have significance not only in
institutional frameworks, but also in the attitudes of those who live on the two
sides. Democracy is cited as a system that should be responsive to people’s
voices. There are indications that citizens in the Western Europe are generally
more eager to have a say in government and have a stronger orientation to
moderate forms of protest. By contrast, non-EU citizens (the former Soviet
Union and some East European nations) seem to display tangible differences in
their patterns of protest and participation. The difference could have crucial
implications for the people’s attitudes and behaviours in the way they relate to
governmental responsiveness. This paper will focus on contrasting attitudes
between the two sides, taking advantage of the World Values Survey to build up a
detailed picture of the differences across Europe.
Guerra, Simona
(University of Sussex,
s.guerra@sussex.ac.uk)
The Hour of Europe Has Come: Polish Support for the EU After Accession
The paper
explores the attitude of Polish public opinion after accession (May 2004-April
2006) and aims to identify which factors impact the level of support. Poland is
the sixth largest EU Member State and the success of its integration is also a
reflection of a successful ‘societal’ integration. Moreover, the latest results
of the European referendum stress the importance of how relevant public opinion
can become in the implementation of European politics.
The accession took place in a pragmatic country: the high majority of Poles
supported the EU, in a smaller percentage than at the opening of the dialogue
with the European institutions, in 1994 (64%). On the contrary more people
opposed membership (29%), but above all Poles knew the EU would have not brought
wealth and less unemployment, 46% of the people thought poverty would have grown
(CBOS data).
As a Member
State
support has returned to steadily grow, while the number of opponents
increasingly declined. Even without any personal gains from membership, Poles
recognise its positive effects. Using a mixed method approach, the paper
identifies whether (and why) political, economic and social actors impact the
level of support, closing on the present situation, after the French and Dutch
‘No’ to the Constitutional Treaty referendum, and the parliamentary and
presidential elections, moving the country rightwards.
Hutcheson, Derek
(University College Dublin,
derek.hutcheson@ucd.ie)
Democracy and Accountability in
Europe:
Common Values?
‘Democracy’ is
a many-faceted concept, and even if a regime contains all the prerequisite
institutions for ‘democratic’ governance, a lack of trust in or support for a
democratic regime can in the long-term lead to questions about its legitimacy.
However, the measurement of this poses several methodological problems. It is
possible to ask citizens in different countries about their attitudes towards
democracy, but do they understand the concepts in similar terms? Whereas in
Western Europe elections are commonly seen as a means of choosing
representatives, there is some evidence that, beyond the EU border, they more
often fulfil the ‘electoral democracy’ criteria of legitimation rather than
accountability. Using surveys, focus groups and other primary materials, this
paper will examine in more detail the extent to which different values are
attached to perceptions of politics, elections and answerability amongst
citizens of new and old EU states compared with their counterparts in the
‘outsider’ nations.
İçener, Erhan
(Queen’s University Belfast,
e.icener@qub.ac.uk)
Understanding
Romania and
Turkey’s Integration with the European Union: Security and Geo-strategic
Considerations
Much of the
existing literature and political discourse on enlargement suggests that it is a
normative process whose speed and direction is driven by conditionality. This
paper challenges these dominant assumptions by exploring the role of security
and geo-strategic considerations in explaining the key decisions of the EU
regarding Romania and Turkey’s integration with the EU. It focuses on the link
between the key decisions affecting both countries’ integration with the EU and
geo-strategic developments such as the end of the Cold War, Kosovo War,
September 11 and security considerations linked to these developments. The paper
argues that conditionality fails to explain the key decisions that have upgraded
Romania and Turkey’s relations with the EU since the mid-1990s. Instead it
posits that geo-strategic developments and security have had a significant and
at times decisive influence on integration. Although they alone do not drive
enlargement, geo-strategic and security considerations not only have strong
explanatory power on their own, but they also influence other factors such as
identity, member state preferences and the costs and benefits of would-be
members’ accession to the EU.
Koelling, Mario
(University of Zaragoza,
mariokoelling@gmx.de)
Explaining Negotiations on Financial Perspectives
2007-2013: Actors and Institutions. How did
New
Member
States
do?
From a political science perspective, my paper, as a summary of the stand of my
PhD project, will focus on the impact of the institutional design on the
negotiation of the financial framework 2007-2013, which was, after the
enlargement and negotiations of the Constitution, an important subject on the
Union’s agenda during 2004/05.
Using a neo-institutional approach, I concentrate on the analysis of actor’s
behaviour during the negotiation process, with special emphasis on the behaviour
of new member states, as new actors in this process. In my paper I will answer
the questions did institutions at the European level, seen as endogenous
variables, shape the behaviour of new member states in recent negotiations on
the financial perspectives 2007-2013 and in case of an affirmative answer which
ones could be detected and how did they influence actor behaviour? My hypotheses
is: Although
the general view is that it is the member states’ national interests that define
their behaviour in financial
negotiations, I argue that we
can also detect several institutional variables at the European level which
determined actor’s behaviour during the negotiation.
Langer, Josef
(University of Klagenfurt,
josef.langer@uni-klu.ac.at)
Small
States
and Democracy in the Order of the European Union
This
contribution will provide a short analysis of the situation of small states in
the European Union (EU). Particular attention will be given to the impact of the
EU on democracy in small states. For this purpose, the contested Constitution
of the European Union will be analysed and related to the special
characteristics and interests of small member states. In the course of this
discussion, the European Union, democracy and small states are set into the
framework of development, whereby the EU is seen as a particular case of
globalization. Different scenarios of EU development are suggested and their
consequences for democracy and small states investigated. A short reflection on
small states theory and the changing assumptions about the impact of “size”
precedes the analysis.
Marzinotto, Benedicta
(London School of Economics & Political Science,
b.marzinotto@lse.ac.uk)
Inflation Differentials in EMU: Why is Germany’s Wage Growth Slower than
Average?
When the EMU
project had been designed, one of the few certainties was that monetary
unification would have favoured some price convergence, and with time, similar
inflation levels across the member states. The decision to define a numerical
inflation target in the conduct of the ECB’s monetary policy was grounded in
that certainty. On the contrary, the empirical evidence points to greater
inflation dispersion after 1999, and even slower inflation in countries where
inflation rates were comparatively low to start with. Looking at the example of
Germany, this paper shows that Germany’s negative inflation differential
originates on the labour market. Economic and institutional pressures explain
slow wage growth in Germany. On the one hand, the completion of the single
European market and the ensuing stronger competition were mostly felt in a
country where for decades there had been a vast social consensus in favour of
the merits of export-led growth. This explains below-average wage growth. On the
other hand, German wage bargainers show awareness of the fact that German wage
settlements have the potential to affect average inflation in EMU just because
the country represents one third of Euro-zone GDP. There is thus an
institutional pressure that forces them into (preventive) self-restraint.
McGrattan, Máire
(Queen’s University
Belfast,
mmcgrattan01@qub.ac.uk)
The Transformative Capacity of EU Enlargement in
Serbia and Montenegro since the 2004 Enlargement
This paper argues that the shift in the dynamics of European Union
enlargement since the 2004 enlargement has implications for the transformative
capacity of EU enlargement in Serbia and Montenegro. Drawing on existing debates
concerning enlargement and europeanisation this paper assesses the
transformative impact that the EU can have and is having on Serbia and
Montenegro in terms of both the economic and political transition processes and
conflict transformation. It argues that this is directly linked to the country’s
involvement in the Stabilisation and Association process and its status as a
‘potential candidate’. However, the changing dynamics of enlargement post-2004
suggest that the actual impact may well be less in the future than the assumed
potential impact. Although negotiations on a Stabilisation and Association
Agreement have commenced the prospect of accession to the EU remains distant and
is being adversely affected by the shifting dynamics of EU enlargement. This
threatens to undermine the transformative capacity of the EU in Serbia and
Montenegro, raising challenges for the EU in developing effective mechanisms and
structures to ensure the desired transformation.
Oikonomou, Iraklis
(University
of Wales, Aberystwyth,
iio02@aber.ac.uk)
The Making of the European Defence Agency: The European
Military-Industrial Capital as an ESDP Actor
As with the case of European integration in general,
the analysis of ESDP integration has centred around the discursive and
political-institutional dimensions of that process. Existing literature has
tended to ignore the socio-economic background on which ESDP is being built,
i.e. the specific social forces whose interests are represented and mediated
through the process of ESDP formation. The present paper seeks to interpret a
crucial aspect of the latter process: the creation of the European Defence
Agency (EDA) and its position in military-industrial affairs within the EU. It
attempts to delineate the theoretical and practical significance of the EDA, and
the implications for the understanding of the broader nature of ESDP formation.
In this context, the paper discusses the validity of the notion of the
internationalised European military- industrial capital as an ESDP actor. The
findings are based upon primary research and several interviews with senior
European officials and industrialists, conducted in
Brussels last year.
The paper adopts a neo-Gramscian framework, based on
a modification of R.W. Cox’s notion of historical structure. The analysis is
part of a novel stream of critical materialist insight into European
integration, as exemplified in the work of Gill, Bieler, van Apeldoorn, van der
Pijl and others. However, while these theorists have applied materialist
analysis on socio-economic aspects of European integration, this paper
highlights its relevance on ESDP analysis. Through an examination of the role of
European military-industrial capital as an ESDP actor, it will be argued that
neo-Gramscianism forms a powerful framework of analysis of the EU
military-industrial policy.
Olsen, Gorm Rye
(Danish Institute for
International Relations, gro@diisdk)
The New Security Architecture and the Global Role of the EU
Since the start
of the European Community, there has been an ambition to turn Europe into a
significant international actor. It is the basic argument of the paper that
September 11 and the new security architecture following 2001 created optimal
opportunities for pushing the EU towards such a more active international role.
Also, it is argued that such a role presupposes that the traditional
compartmentalization of EU politics is softened quite significantly. The two
arguments argument are ‘tested’ based on a scrutiny of the recent changes in the
EU’s development assistance policy, its humanitarian aid policy and not least on
a scrutiny of the significant changes in the CFSP/ESDP towards Africa and the
Balkans. The analysis is made by means of a theoretical framework which combines
theories on the EU’s internal character with analysis of its international
situation as it has recently been suggested by C. Hill and M. Smith.
Phinnemore, David
(Queen’s University Belfast,
d.phinnemore@qub.ac.uk)
Moldova:
A Step too Far for EU Enlargement?
With the
further enlargement of the European Union (EU) in 2007-08 Moldova will become
the EU’s newest direct neighbour. Sandwiched between Romania and Ukraine, the
country currently has a developing relationship with the EU that both political
elites and the population wish to see result in EU membership. The EU, however,
has resisted calls to provide the country with a membership perspective and
treats the country instead firmly as part of its European Neighbourhood Policy.
This is despite the legitimate claim of Moldova to a ‘European’ vocation. As
this paper argues, the EU’s handling of Moldova’s integration aspirations
provides insights into not only the dynamics of enlargement per se but also the
manner in which they have been affected by the 2004 enlargement. The case of
Moldova – a country very much in a category of its own in terms of being small,
landlocked, contested, divided, peripheral – raises questions about the
inevitability of further enlargement and suggests the need for greater attention
to be paid to geopolitics and overriding regionally-focused enlargement
narratives for explaining the dynamics of enlargement.
Pfister, Thomas
(Queen’s University Belfast,
t.pfister@qub.ac.uk)
Investigating the European Employment Strategy/the Lisbon Strategy from a
Citizenship Perspective: Gender Equality in Germany, Hungary and the UK
The paper
investigates the involvement of the European Union in transformations of social
and economic citizenship through the European Employment Strategy/the Lisbon
Strategy. In order to ‘modernise’ European labour markets and employment
policies, the principle of ‘bringing as many people into the labour market as
possible’ has acquired paradigmatic status notwithstanding the diverse welfare
regimes. This raises questions about the conditions under which such maximal
labour market participation could and should be achieved?
Gender equality is a key requirement for just and inclusive
citizenship and can, moreover, be seen as crucial test for its present
transformations.
Against this background, the paper presents insights from a
comparative case study on Germany, Hungary and the UK that is guided by two
questions: first, how do recent reforms affect national formations of
citizenship? And second, how is the Union
involved in these processes?
Although the direct impact of the Lisbon Strategy is rather weak, the EU,
nevertheless, constitutes an important arena, where core concepts (e.g.
‘activation’, ‘life-work balance’) are interpreted and defined by the member
states. It is argued that these particular interpretations are crucial for the
course of national developments. Acknowledging these consequences and
facilitating a broader public debate could be a crucial contribution of the Union to just,
democratic and more inclusive citizenship.
Rees, Nick
(University of Limerick,
nicholas.rees@ul.ie)
The Institutional Dynamics of EU-UN Security Cooperation: Problems and Prospects
The increasing
level and intensity of contacts and discussions between the EU and the UN on
security matters, particularly in the context of UN demands for a greater
European role in international peacekeeping raises critical questions about what
role the EU should and can play as security actor in and on behalf of the UN.
This paper explores both the EU and UN perspectives, by looking at the different
actors involved in the process, their institutional positions, as well as the
organisational context in which the interactions are taking place. The research
highlights that while there is a joint political commitment to enhanced EU-UN
cooperation this is difficult to achieve in practice for a variety of political
and military reasons. Notably, there are differing security priorities among
the EU member states, despite member state commitments to a European security
strategy, as well as a political reluctance among many EU states to engage in
substantial and potentially protracted peacekeeping (UN or otherwise) beyond
Europe. There are also practical difficulties in developing military
cooperation with the UN, reflecting the varying demands being made on European
military forces, the level of intra-European security cooperation (e.g. such as
the fledgling battle groups), and even the difficulty of sharing military
intelligence with the UN. The paper concludes by suggesting that EU-UN security
cooperation remains problematic, although not impossible, depending on whether
the political will exists within the EU to make it happen.
Savkova, Lyubka
(University of Sussex,
ls23@sussex.ac.uk)
Next Stop, Evropa! Bulgarian Public Opinion and Support for
Europe
Prior to Accession
Public support for
Europe in Bulgaria is comparatively higher than in the rest of Central and
Eastern Europe,
while opposition to EU membership is one of the lowest in the region. This is
despite of series of disappointments to Bulgaria from the EU such as the
inclusion of Bulgaria in the black list of countries in 1995, the delay to the
start of the accession negotiations agreed at the Luxemburg Council in 1997 and
most recently in 2004 the inclusion of a back-up clause into Bulgaria’s
accession treaty that could see the country’s membership date postponed to 2008.
Currently, there is no research that explains the reasons for the unwavering
public support for
Europe in
Bulgaria.
With this in mind the aim of this article is twofold. In its first part it
generates, comparatively to Central and Eastern Europe and on the basis of
Eurobarometer data for Bulgaria from 1997 and 2003, patterns of support for EU
membership which are formed with seven independent variables: public image of
the EU, expected benefits from EU membership, occupation, age, education,
knowledge about the EU and voting intensions of respondents. It then progresses
to the second part to discuss the outlined patterns which feeds into the wider
question of the high levels of support for Europe in Bulgaria.
Shaw, Jo (University
of Edinburgh, jo.shaw@ed.ac.uk)
Mainstreaming Equality And Diversity In European Union Law And Policy
This paper has
twin objectives: (1) to consider how it is possible to give constitutional form
and effect to the principles of equality and diversity, in the wider context of
(2) delivering effective, transparent and legitimate governance in the European
Union (hereinafter ‘EU’ or ‘Union’). In the context of strategies for securing
equality and diversity and in the context of the emergent EU constitutional
system, it pays particular attention to the meanings and scope of the tool of
‘mainstreaming’.
Treib, Oliver
(Institute for Advanced Studies,
treib@ihs.ac.at)
Joint paper with Gerda Falkner and Miriam Hartlapp
Worlds of Compliance: Why Leading Approaches to EU Implementation are Only
‘Sometimes-True Theories’
This paper
summarises the main theoretical findings of a large-scale qualitative project on
the transposition, enforcement and application of six EU labour law Directives
in fifteen member states. Focusing on the transposition stage, our argument
starts from a theoretical puzzle: When confronting the empirical results from
our 91 cases with the various hypotheses that we derived from the literature, it
turns out that all causal conditions suggested by existing theories, and even
two of the most prominent hypotheses (on misfit and veto players), have at best
rather weak explanatory power. On closer inspection, our qualitative studies
show that even their basic rationale does not hold in some groups of countries.
As a solution, we offer a typology of three worlds of compliance within the
fifteen EU member states covered by our study, each of which is characterised by
an ideal-typical transposition style: a “world of law observance”, a “world of
domestic politics”, and a “world of neglect”. This typology provides the key to
understanding when and how individual theoretical propositions are relevant.
Vasiljevic, Snjezana
(University of Zagreb,
svasilje@pravo.hr)
Intersection between Gender and Racial Discrimination: Legal Aspects
The equality
principle will have a far-reaching impact on EU law in the coming years. This
influence has already been reflected in the adoption of directives based on the
Article 13 EC (the Article giving the Community the competence to adopt
non-discrimination measures), case law of the European Court of Justice and the
Community's commitments to „mainstreaming“. The Court of Justice has held that
principle of equality is one of the general principles of Community law. Within
the sphere of community law, the principle of equality precludes comparable
situations from being treated differently, and different situations from being
treated in the same way unless the treatment is objectively justified.
This paper explores the extent to which Croatian law applies principles of
equality and non-discrimination to the activities of public authorities in
Croatia, broadly defined to include national machineries (e.g. Parliament and
executive authorities) and the courts. The meanings of equality and
discrimination are diverse. There is no one legal meaning of equality or
discrimination applicable in the different circumstances. Therefore, it will be
interested to observe how Croatian legal framework expresses the notion of
equality and how national machineries and courts interpret it. In that respect,
Croatian antidiscrimination norms, in particular, those that forbid
discrimination on the grounds of sex and ethnic origin will be analysed. The
process of harmonisation of Croatian legislation with the EU law opens up a
space for new developments in interpreting domestic legislation which will cause
revolutionary changes in Croatian jurisprudence.
Vila Maior, Paulo (Universidade Fernando Pessoa, Porto, Portugal
pvilamaior@tvtel.pt)
The European Union: a Case of Unconventional
Fiscal Federalism?
There
has been a lively debate among scholars about the feasibility and desirability
of fiscal federalism in the European Union (EU). The paper addresses the
question of whether ‘conventional fiscal federalism’ is feasible in the EU,
considering the distinctiveness of European integration and the
political-economic template of Economic and Monetary Union (EMU). It is an
attempt to bridge the gap between economics and political science by adding the
political conditions that might create difficulties to economics’ rationale.
The paper highlights how fiscal federalism is multi-faceted concept embracing
both a centralisation and a decentralisation outcome. Borrowing the Musgravian
classification of allocation-equity-stabilisation, the EU is examined as far as
redistribution is concerned. The aim is to conclude whether centralisation or
decentralisation is the prevailing outcome. For that purpose, the EU is compared
with five mature federations on two issues: the depth of regional asymmetries;
and the extent to which regional inequalities are redressed through
redistribution.
Considering that in the EU: i) the current distribution of fiscal competences is
favourable to member states; ii) decentralisation is the outcome for the
redistribution function; iii) despite monetary policy is the main tool for
macroeconomic stabilisation, and this is a policy arena where centralisation
prevails; iv) the diminished scope for inter-state solidarity averts more
centralisation in redistribution; and v) the absent political willingness from
national governments to increase the EU budget; all this suggests that
centralised, ‘conventional fiscal federalism’ is ruled out as a feasible
solution for the EU.
Notwithstanding this doesn’t imply that fiscal federalism is absent from the EU.
A distinct, decentralised modality of fiscal federalism already exists, coping
with the ‘sui generis’ nature of European integration.
White, Stephen
(University of Glasgow,
s.white@socsci.gla.ac.uk)
Joint paper with
Julia Korosteleva and Ian McAllister
Are Russians Europeans?
Russia
has always had an ambiguous status in relation to
Europe,
not only geographically but also culturally. But as the European Union extends
east, there is no immediate or even long-term prospect of membership. Using
national surveys conducted between 2000 and 2005, this paper examines the extent
to which Russians identify themselves as ‘Europeans’, and the place that
‘Europe’ occupies within their repertoire of allegiances. Comparisons will also
be drawn with Belarus and Ukraine, the two other Slavic members of the EU's new
‘neighbourhood’.
Last modified:
Monday, 14 August 2006
idD410601ProgrammeR3 +16Feb2006
©UACES 2006