Home > Conferences and Events > Calendar of Events > Zagreb 2005 > Research Session 3
UACES
35th Annual Conference and 10th Research
Conference
The
European Union: Past and Future
Enlargements
Research Session 3
UACES reserves the right at all times to make changes to the programme where necessary.
Session 1 | Session 2 | Session 3 | Session 4 | Session 5 | Session 6 | Full Programme
Monday, 5 September (16:15-17:45)
The panels listed in the table below are followed by the abstracts for each of the papers.
|
Panel Title:
Europeanisation and Party Politics Chair: Wolfram Kaiser (wolfram.kaiser@port.ac.uk) Papers: Flood/Usherwood, Gray/Diez Medrano, Holmes |
|
International In(ter)vention of the Balkans Chair: Michael Smith (m.h.smith@lboro.ac.uk) Papers: Goumenos, Juncos Garcia, Kavalski |
|
New
Member States and the European Parliament Chair: Karen Henderson (kh10@le.ac.uk) Papers: Bale, Benedetto, Whitaker |
|
The EU's
Impact in Central and Eastern Europe Chair: Jackie Gower (jackie.gower@kcl.ac.uk) Papers: Baun, Galbreath, Pérez-Solórzano, Wilk |
|
The
Constitutional Treaty and the 'Intergovernmental' EU Chair: Michelle Cini (michelle.cini@bris.ac.uk) Papers: Bono, Brkan, Hoffmann |
|
Interest
Representation in the EU Chair: Jenny Fairbrass (j.fairbrass@bradford.ac.uk) Papers: Pallis, Vidačak |
|
Croatia
and the EU Chair: David Phinnemore (d.phinnemore@qub.ac.uk) Papers: Fidermuc Maler, Stulhofer/Landripet/Rimac |
|
Explaining EU Enlargement I Chair: Federica Bicchi (f.c.bicchi@lse.ac.uk) Papers: Barnes/Randerson, Edwards, Svyetlov |
|
The
Security Implications of EU Enlargement I Chair: Alistair Shepherd (a.shepherd@aber.ac.uk) Papers: Holtom, Pace, Welch |
|
Judicial
Culture and Enlargement of the EU Chair: Fiona Beveridge (f.c.beveridge@liv.ac.uk) Papers: Capeta, Kühn, Rodin |
Bale, Tim (University of
Sussex)
Joint paper with Paul Taggart.
First Time MEPs: Role
Orientations and Realities
The EP
is more powerful and has more members than ever before. But it seems no nearer
to overcoming the disconnect between the EU and its citizens, even though it is
the Union's only directly representative institution. This paper focuses on
those representatives, and in particular on those who have joined the
institution since June 2004. Reporting on a research project based on
semi-structured interviews with fifty first time MEPs and the construction of a
database on all new members, it reports on their backgrounds, their routes into
the parliament, and the roles they seem and hope to take on. It posits a
typology of inductively developed role orientations before concluding with some
of the implications of that typology for the study of the EP.
Barnes, Ian (University of Lincoln,
ibarnes@lincoln.ac.uk)
Joint
paper with Claire Randerson
When Does
Conditionality Stop? The Willingness to Keep to the Deal
The 2004
enlargement process was significant both in terms of the size of the event and
the way that the EU attempted to shape the economic and political development of
the applicant states prior to membership. This process came to an end in a
formal sense as the applicant states actually joined in May 2004 when
conditionality ceased to be meaningful as an instrument of change. From this
point on it was hoped that the new members would become europeanised in the
sense that the changes which were agreed would become permanent.
This paper examines the lessons that have emerged as a result of the 2004
enlargement and asks if the process of change was meaningful in all areas. Did
constitutional conditionality cease to become meaningful in areas like minority
rights well before enlargement? There is some evidence to suggest that perhaps
it did. What has been the commitment to technical conditionality with respect to
the single market? One year after the enlargement, some evidence is starting to
emerge about this issue. What lessons have been learnt with respect to the next
wave of enlargement due to commence in 2007? Clearly the EU’s negotiators will
have reflected upon the experience of the last enlargement to inform their
negotiating stance.
Baun, Michael (Valdosta State
University, USA, mbaun@valdosta.edu)
Joint paper
with Dan Marek
Regional Policy and Decentralization in the Czech
Republic
As a condition
of membership, the Czech Republic and other candidate countries were required to
create regionalized administrative systems for the implementation of EU
Structural Funds assistance. However, the EU did not impose any sort of uniform
template for such regional administration systems, leaving candidate states to
decide how to create these in accordance with their own national traditions or
political requirements. In the Czech Republic, political resistance to
decentralization resulted in the creation of system of regional governments that
possessed only limited powers, as well as a fairly centralized system for
administering Structural Funds assistance.
Although it has not yet been one year since formal accession, there has now been
some experience with the actual implementation of Structural Funds assistance in
the Czech
Republic, and planning has already begun for regional policy in the next
(2007-2013) budgetary period. As a consequence, some longer-term trends may
already be appearing that allow us to predict developments in the future. This
paper will examine the experience with Structural Funds policy in the Czech
Republic since accession, to see if the implementation of this policy has
consolidated the centralized administrative system or led to further pressures
for decentralization.
The political (decentralizing) impact of EU regional policy in old (pre-2004)
member states has been considerably examined in the literature, as has to some
extent the impact of EU accession requirements in the area of regional policy on
candidate states in the pre-accession period. This paper will add to and build
on this literature, by examining the impact of EU regional policy in a new
member state, in the initial period after accession as it gains experience with
newly-created regional institutions and administrative processes.
Benedetto, Giacomo
(University of Manchester)
g.benedetto@lse.ac.uk
Enlargement,
Institutional Change, and the Pervasiveness of Consensus in the European
Parliament
The path
dependence of consensus provides a theoretical explanation for analysing the
behaviour of political groups in the European Parliament, given the twin
challenges of increased institutional powers and EU Enlargement over the last
decade. Analysis of roll call votes, competition for positions of influence
inside the Parliament, and executive-legislative relations show that, despite
the heterogeneity of the political groups and rational expectations of an
increase in party-based competition, Parliament will remain a consensual
institution. The paper proposes a framework for testing whether the original
conditions establishing consensus will persist and increase in the light of the
arrival of 162 MEPs from new member States. Implications concerning
consensus-based systems and the effects of rapid institutional change will be
drawn from the findings of the eventual research.
Bono, Giovanna (Vrije
Universiteit Brussels, Belgium,
giovanna.bono@vub.ac.be)
The Parliamentary
Accountability Gap in EU-led External Security Engagements: Issues, Visions and
Proposals
The paper has
two aims: after briefly reviewing the key debates about the parliamentary
accountability aspects of EU and UN-led external security engagements, the paper
evaluates the potential impact that the adoption of the European Constitution
and of the package of reform advanced by the UN panel on Threats, Challenges and
Change could have on the practices and democratic accountability aspects of EU-led
security engagements. The second aim is to categorise and critically review
other proposals for strengthening democratic accountability aspects of EU-led
peacekeeping and peace-enforcement operations gathered through a survey that the
author has undertaken with leading members of the Defence and Foreign Affairs
Committees of the British, French and Italian parliaments and of MEPs.
Brkan, Maja (majabrkan@yahoo.com)
The Jurisdiction
of the ECJ in Matters of CFSP in the Light of Constitutional Treaty
The paper
aims to examine the question of jurisdiction of the ECJ in matters of CFSP in
the light of the Constitutional Treaty (CT). The CFSP is not only strictly
delimitated from other EU external policies; it is also exempted from the
jurisdiction of the ECJ. According to Article III-376 CT, there are only two
areas in which the ECJ is endowed with jurisdiction: first, when the CFSP might
affect “the application of the procedures and the extent of powers” for the
exercise of Union competences, and second, when the Court “reviews the legality
of European decisions providing for restrictive measures against natural or
legal persons”. The paper tries to establish whether this is an introduction of
a “political questions” doctrine (originally pertaining to the US judiciary) in
the EU legal order and what are the arguments for and against the jurisdiction
of the ECJ in CFSP matters.
Capeta, Tamara (University of Zagreb,
tamara@irmo.hr)
Preliminary References from New Member States in the
First Year of Membership
The aim of
this paper is to look into the preliminary references submitted by the courts of
the 2004 enlargement Member States, in order to find out which national courts
were refering, which kind of questions were they mostly asking, and to find out
in which way the questions were refered by national judges. This research should
confirm (or not) my assertion in previous paper that legal culture of new
ex-communist Member States still differs from the predominant legal culture in
the EU and its ‘old’ Member States. Its second aim is to learn whether and how
the experience of early membership may be used in the preparation of Croatian
judges for the accession in the EU. The research will be conducted on the basis
of the web accessible data about the references (as published in the OJ C), on
the information received directly from the new Member States, as well as on the
information to be gathered during the planned short stay at the European Court
of Justice.
Edwards, Sobrina (University
of Sussex,
sre22@sussex.ac.uk)
Explaining
Enlargement: Identity, Space and Governance
The
Enlargement that occurred in May 2004 saw the official EUropean space enlarge to
encompass the countries of east and central Europe as well as the Mediterranean
countries of Malta and Cyprus. It is the communication of this event that is the
focus of this paper. Concentrating upon the 'public' publications of the
European institutions of the Parliament and Commission, it asks how, in attempts
to explain Enlargement to the EUropean public constructions of European space
and identity were linked to ideas about the nature and purpose of the EUropean
project. It will be argued that, in 'explaining' Enlargement, particular
constructions and narratives of European space and place were combined with
those of European governance to legitimise both the rationale of enlargement and
more fundamentally, the process of European integration itself. This paper will
draw upon a discourse analysis approach.
Fidermuc Maler, Zrinka (Universität
Gießen, Germany, zrinkakatarina@web.de)
Croatian European Policy: On the Road to the Full EU-Membership
In this
article the author raises the following question: What has Croatia done since it
has gained sovereignty in order to build up closer ties to the EC/EU and to join
the Union in the second enlargement round planned for 2007?
From the theoretical point of view there are three approaches most suitable for
the analysis of Croatian European policy: the action-reaction approach
based on behaviourism, the decision-making approach and the structural
approach. These approaches are valid for both the evolutionary and
systematic perspective.
The whole
development of Croatian European policy can be analysed only by implementing and
combining those three theoretical approaches to foreign policy. That being said
the author proceeds from the following assumption: Since the international
recognition the Croatian foreign policy explored the possibilities of
approaching to and finally joining the EC/EU. During both phases of political
development in Croatia (the „Tuđman era“ in the 1990s; Mesić/Račan, Mesić/Sanader
after 2000) many different and competing ideas, styles, as well as a different
emphasis on the formulating and implementing Croatian European policy made the
progress difficult and slow.
Presented paper scrutinizes among others the academic literature on Croatian
foreign and European policy. Many authors have already exploited the
goal-mean-approach to define its goals and strategies in the past and have
omitted a systematic research of the factors important for further development
of that policy. That missing point will be the primary research topic of this
paper, providing institutional foundations for the Croatian EU-policy, foreign
inputs and influences on that policy as well as analysis of the structures and
actors in Croatian governmental decision making process regarding the relations
to the EC/EU. The interviews conducted with outstanding political decision
makers (former foreign and European ministers, prime ministers, former
representatives in the EG/EU, political advisers to the president) displayed
unknown processes, decisions and structures and provided an insight into the
“grey literature”.
Flood, Chris (University of Surrey,
c.flood@surrey.ac.uk)
Joint
paper with Simon Usherwood
A Developing Model of Partisan Alignment on EU
Integration
There is an increasingly extensive literature on the
party politics of Euroscepticism, considered either in comparative perspective
or in relation to single states. There is also a literature which approaches the
dynamics of party positioning in a broader perspective, considering support for
EU integration as well as opposition. These studies provide important analytical
frames but this paper argues the value of a ‘thicker’, more qualitative
approach. The literature on Euroscepticism tends to isolate the phenomenon of
opposition from that of support, although most parties described as
Eurosceptical do not have simple positions but complex mixtures including
elements of support for aspects of integration. The literature on broader
alignments avoids the latter pitfall but uses highly reductive models of
positions, transitions and ideological dispositions. Both sets of literature
largely exclude consideration of intra-party factions, pressure groups and
think-tanks. Building on earlier, preliminary work, the paper further develops a
model offering closer, qualitative analysis of the ideological dimension;
closer attention to varying organizational forms and channels of opposition or
support; more precise identification of opportunity structures; a sophisticated,
but economical typology of positions at the output end; and a framework for
conceptualising the interaction between the ideological and the institutional
factors leading to consistency or change in group positions over time.
Galbreath, David (University of
Aberdeen, d.galbreath@abdn.ac.uk)
EU Enlargement and
the Minority Rights Regime: Value transfer in Central and Eastern Europe
The latest
round of EU enlargement focused on the issue of minority rights unlike any
earlier enlargement. This concentration on minority rights illustrates the
post-Cold War establishment of a minority rights regime in Europe. I argue that
the key actors in this regime are the European Commission, the OSCE High
Commissioner on the Protection of National Minorities, and the Council of
Europe’s Congress on Local and Regional Authorities. Adopting Tsebelis’s
concept, this essay argues that these key actors were the ‘veto players’ in EU
enlargement. In this essay, I will engage with several questions. Firstly, how
has the issue of minority rights changed in Europe since the end of the Cold
War? Second, in this context, what do we mean by regime and in what form does
this take? Third, in what way was political conditionality implemented in
prospective member-states? In particular, was there a value transfer whereby
policy-makers ‘adopted’ views of multiculturalism and minority protection or did
these states play the part of rational decision-makers, only doing enough to
make it past the ‘veto players’? Finally, how is this process being used in the
prelude of the next round of enlargement where the issue of minorities remains
an important factor? I will rely on documents and interviews for the empirical
elements of the essay.
Goumenos, Thomas (Panteion
University of Athens, Greece, goumenos@hotmail.com)
Greek Perception of the Balkans: Edgy Coexistence or
Difficult Relationship?
In the
dominant Greek narrative, the Balkans has remained an ambiguous term for
identification. On the one hand, large segments of the population have been
ready to acknowledge Greece’s belonging to the Balkans and recognise certain
cultural affinities with at least some of the other Balkan people. On the other,
the political connotations of the term “Balkans” – i.e. its suggestion of the
“backward” past of Greece and the institutional Other to the “West” – implicates
the requirement for economic and political development in which the country has
tended to lag behind. Moreover, the history of confrontations with other states
of the region has impeded the acceptance of a common Balkan identity in Greece.
This paper investigates how the Balkan conflicts in the 1990s have influenced
the Greek perception of the Balkans and the Greek identity, per se. The first
suggestion is that these conflicts, and especially the one in Kosovo with the
subsequent NATO intervention, have strengthened the negative (non-western and
non-Balkan) and particularistic aspects of Greek self-identification. The second
suggestion is that there has been established an inconvenient ideological
accommodation of the apparent discrepancy between the official policies of the
Greek governments in relation to the Balkan conflicts as a member-state of NATO
and the EU, and the dominant views of the Greek public. Thence, the paper
contributes to the discussion of another “external” perception of the Balkans,
from the point of view of a country whose own identity is in limbo between
belonging and exclusion from the region.
Gray, Emily (University of Leeds,
e.gray@leeds.ac.uk)
Joint
paper with Juan Diez Medrano
How Political Actors Frame European Integration in the Public Sphere: A
Cross-National and Cross-Actor Comparison
With the European
project currently in crisis following the No votes to the EU Constitution in
France and the Netherlands, it is a crucial time to examine the terms in which
actors in European states have publicly opposed or supported European
integration, a topic into which little systematic empirical research has been
conducted. Our focus is on the ‘frames’ that collective actors in seven
European countries have publicly invoked to justify their positions for or
against European integration, important since past studies show that the ways in
which ordinary
citizens reason about and take positions on issues such as European integration
are significantly shaped by debates in the public sphere.
We use two
original cross-national datasets – 1) political claims made by collective actors
in the mass media, and 2) media claims made in newspaper editorials - to analyse
the dominant clusters of frames (e.g., sovereignty, economy, national identity)
promoted by state, civil society and media actors in public debates about
Europe. This enables us to present findings regarding the framing of European
integration by these actor types in seven countries (D, F, UK, ES, IT, NL, CH),
and consider their implications for the present malaise of public communication
about Europe.
Hoffmann, Lars (University of Oxford,
lars.hoffmann@sant.ox.ac.uk)
Making Europe Less
Democratic: The New Permanent President of the European Council
The debate about whether the European Council needs a permanent
president was one of the most voracious of the Convention on the Future of
Europe. Intergovernmentalists saw is as a way to better co-ordinate the European
Council’s work by making it more consistent and efficient. Federalists saw it as
a threat to the leading role of the Commission president in terms of rights of
legislative initiatives. However, what would the introduction of a permanent
president of the European Council do with regards to the initial merit of the
Convention – making the
Union more transparent, accountable and democratic?
The aim of this paper is to assess the consequence of permanent President of the
European Council on the EU’s institutional framework. The paper argues that the
Presidency does not decrease the EU’s democratic deficit and in fact strengthens
the Council at the expense of the other European institutions. It therefore
further strengthens the position of the member states in their role of
determining the future path of integration by making them effectively less
accountable in their doings at the European level vis-à-vis their electorates.
So the new permanent president of the European Council strengthens national
executives, threatens the inter-institutional balance so pivotal to the European
governance and does nothing to decrease the EU’s democratic deficit.
Holmes, Michael (Liverpool Hope
University College, holmesm@hope.ac.uk)
Europeanisation
and Political Parties: Developing an Understanding of the European-National
Political Domains
This paper
seeks to contribute to two developing strands of analysis in relation to the EU
– on Europeanisation, and on the role of the political parties. The paper seeks
to develop an understanding of the parameters of Europeanisation when applied to
political parties, and will challenge some of the existing approaches. It does
so in two ways. First, it suggests that not enough attention has been paid to
the significance of whether a party is pro- or anti-EU in terms of its degree of
Europeanisation. Second, it argues that analyses to date have not paid adequate
consideration to one important feature of the Europeanisation of parties – the
extent to which they are beginning to alter national political structures and
systems in the light of their European policies and experiences. The paper is
based on a case-study analysis of the Irish Labour Party.
Holtom, Paul (University of Glamorgan,
pd_holtom@yahoo.co.uk)
Illicit Arms Trafficking in the Baltic States
This
paper will focus upon the alignment of the Baltic States with EU initiatives
relating to controlling legal, and combating illegal, transfers of weaponry and
other sensitive goods. After briefly commenting upon the challenges posed by
the illicit arms trade in the post-Cold War era, a summary of the EU’s main
efforts to harmonise export control legislation and co-ordinate responses to the
illicit arms trade at the regional level will be discussed. This will be
followed by a consideration of the EU’s assessments of the Baltic States’
support for EU-led initiatives in this sphere and their export controls for
weaponry and sensitive goods. As the Baltic States change from ‘gateways’ to EU
‘gatekeepers’, they may struggle to meet the demands of Schengen EU unless they
can overcome a number of challenges, ranging from problems with inter-agency and
transnational communication, co-operation and information exchanges to lack of
resources, corruption, and containerised security threats. The particular
challenges posed by the Kaliningrad region will also be considered. Finally,
will the Baltic States as EU Member States provide an impetus for or a block on
EU-Russian and Baltic Sea regional co-operative efforts for combating illicit
arms trafficking?
Juncos
Garcia, Ana (Loughborough University,
a.e.juncos@lboro.ac.uk)
The EU’s
Post-conflict Intervention in Bosnia and Herzegovina: (Re)integrating the
Balkans and/or (Re)inventing the EU?
Following the
often-cited “fiasco” of the EU during the Yugoslavian wars, the later EU’s
interventions in the Balkans and, in particular, in Bosnia and Herzegovina, may
conversely serve as a scenario to foster the process of emergence of an EU
international identity. Thus, CFSP/ESDP activities in BiH would play a dual role
helping to (re)integrate BiH into the European mainstream, as well as favouring
the development of an EU common identity as a normative power in its
neighbourhood. EU’s intervention in BiH, supported by significant economic
assistance and aiming to promote regional cooperation, human rights, democracy
and rule of law, has proved to be essential for the economic recovery and
institutional stability of the country. Besides, in the field of security, the
institutionalisation and implementation of the first ESDP missions in BiH (the
EU Police Mission and the EUFOR Althea) can play an important role in (re)integrating
BiH into the European security structures. On the other hand, these activities
may have reinforced the EU’s commitment to the promotion of democratic goals,
the CFSP/ESDP credibility (having now the possibility of resorting to military
instruments under certain conditions) and fostered endogenous processes of
socialisation facilitating the construction/reinvention of the EU international
identity as a normative power.
Kavalski, Emilian (Loughborough
University, e.r.kavalski@lboro.ac.uk)
Iraq After the
Balkans, the Balkans After Iraq: Who Is Next?
This paper
acknowledges that both the Balkans and Iraq have become emblematic features of
the post-Cold War geography of international relations. The suggestion, however,
is that by concentrating on the current ruptures in the Euro-Atlantic community,
most commentators: (i) neglect the macrohistorical tendency of the US towards
unilateralism in response to ‘existential threats’ and to multilateral
approaches whenever and wherever the sense of urgency is not that pressing; and
(ii) overlook that the Iraq crisis is an aberration, in an otherwise persisting
transatlantic cooperation. Subsequently, the exploration makes several claims.
Firstly, it concentrates on the externally-driven processes of
order-promotion in the region. The argument is that the Iraq crisis did not
impact dramatically the import of both the EU and NATO in the region. The reason
is that the Balkans persists as an area of cooperation between the transatlantic
partners, as a result of their reaction to the Kosovo crisis. Secondly, this
survey sketches the current regional perspective, which suggests that the
transatlantic rows offered Balkan states the opportunity to pursue particular
agendas. Finally, thirdly, this study prompts the argument that unlike
Iraq,
the Balkans are not prone to a relapse of another bout of their hackneyed
‘Balkanisation’
Kühn, Zdenek (Charles University,
Czech Republic,
zdenku@seznam.cz)
Shaping Multilevel
Constitutionalism: First Decisions of the New EU Member States' Constitutional
Courts
While
pluralist conceptions of the interactions between European and national legal
orders was rising in Western Europe, post-communist Europe came back to the
Kelsenian concept of the legal system as a pyramid. While for Western
Europeans it is the concept which cannot describe the relation between EU and
national law, for Central and Eastern Europeans this concept is charming as
something rediscovered quite recently. In communist Europe the very paradigm of
continental legal thinking, a classical hierarchy of legal sources, in fact
disappeared; the single legal order composed of the enumerated sources of law
was replaced by an enormous number of decrees of very different character, some
of them even not promulgated in the official gazettes. That is why
post-communist lawyers of the new Member States stick so much to the classical
Kelsenian paradigm of the legal system. One might therefore wonder what will be
the answer of the new EU Member States’ constitutional courts to the question of
the position
of their system to EU law. The paper will analyze the first decisions of Central
European constitutional courts relating to this issue which is for the
successful application of EU law conditio sine qua non.
Pace, Roderick (University of Malta,
roderick.pace@um.edu.mt)
EU Enlargement: The Mediterranean Dimension
The
Mediterranean region has always been an area of co-operation and conflict. In
the post Cold War period, new challenges have arisen, such as WMD proliferation,
terrorism and organised crime. As the challenges have increased, new security
initiatives have also been created, involving not only NATO and the EU, but also
smaller regional bodies, such as the ‘Five plus Five’ arrangements. The paper
will consider how these security arrangements have dealt with such security
concerns, focusing on how they have adapted to the post September 11th
security environment.
The paper will also consider the effects of enlargement on the region. New CEEC
member states will become, at least formally, members of the Euro-Mediterranean
Partnership. As a result, will dialogue with the Southern Shore states be
enhanced or rendered more difficult because of the diverse cultural identities
and competing priorities? The balance of influence within the EU, as a result
of enlargement, definitely shifts eastwards. The entry of Cyprus and Malta will
barely redress this shift. As a result, are the EU's New Neighbourhood Policy
and the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership adequate to meet the challenges of the
region?
Pallis, Athanasios (University of the
Aegean, Greece, apallis@aegean.gr)
Interests
Representation in the EU: Lessons from the Maritime Case
The
paper examines of maritime interests representation in the EU and extracts
conclusion on the structures and the governability of interests representation
in the process of sectoral policy integration.
Following a literature review of the role of maritime interest groups in the EU
policy-making (Section 2), the paper analyses the variety of interest groups
representing the maritime sector in EU affairs, as well as that of their
structures, including membership numbers and types, location, internal
structures (staff, committees) and budget (Section 3). Section 4 focuses on the
lobbying practices they follow in order to influence policy outcomes. Both these
sections use a primary data-set consisting of replies to a questionnaire that
has been distributed to all the interest groups that are either members of the
MIF, or are listed in relevant directories.
Using the same data-set, Section 5 offers inside knowledge of these interest
groups and weighs the degree to which different factors affect the governability
of maritime interests’ representation. The paper assesses how the ‘EU
environment’ or the ‘economic environment’ affect the capacities of the existing
maritime related interest groups with the contribution Moreover, it determines
which circumstances contribute to, or undermine, the cohesiveness of these
organisations and their potential to meet the needs of their members and become
a coherent policy actor in the EU policy-making.
Pérez-Solórzano, Nieves (University of
East Anglia, Norwich, n.perez-solorzano@uea.ac.uk)
The Europeanisation of Civil Society in Central and
Eastern Europe: A Comparison between NGOs and BIAs in the New Member State
The 2004
enlargement has transformed the European political arena. While the EU comes to
terms with a membership of 25 nation-states and 450 million citizens, the
accession strategies developed by the candidate countries from Eastern Europe to
meet the EU’s membership criteria have transformed their political and
socio-economic domestic environments, against a background of systemic change
since 1989. Most of the literature studying the effect of EU membership on
accession countries (ACs) uses the Europeanisation framework to assess patterns
of policy transfer, the scale of domestic adaptation and the institutional and
administrative capability of the new member states to meet EU standards as
defined by 1993 accession criteria and the Commission’s prescriptive advice
which framed the accession negotiations. Given the importance of civil society
and organised interests in a participatory model of democracy, it is surprising
that few studies have analysed the impact of EU membership on interest
intermediation in the ACs in a theoretically informed way and from a comparative
perspective. This paper seeks to fill this void and expand the remit of
Europeanisation by assessing the impact of EU membership on the national and
transnational repertoires for interest intermediation in the Czech Republic,
Slovenia and Hungary by answering the following questions:
Is
it possible to identify the impact of EU accession on interest intermediation
through shifts towards more EU oriented priorities?
Is
it possible to identify a differentiated effect depending on who the
stakeholders are?
Do
different national scenarios react differently to EU influence?
Rodin, Siniša (University of Zagreb,
srodin@inet.hr)
Publication of Judicial Decisions as an Element of
Legal Culture
The proposed
paper discusses practices and forms of publication of judicial decisions in
different legal cultures (US, EU, Croatia) and how published judicial decisions
interact with social environment. The starting assumptions of the paper are:
1/ Harmonisation
of a legal system of a candidate country with the legal system of the EU reaches
beyond mere reception of legal rules and includes semantic harmonisation;
2/
Pursuing
concept of "dominant culture" introduced by Iris M. Young, I propose that
members of dominant legal culture in candidate countries and new Member States
have difficulties to break away from well established national practices since
they see them as universal.
Based on
these assumptions I propose that both, legal formalism and judicial activism are
equally meaningless if separated from social reality on which judicial decisions
are based and claim that systematic, extensive and complete publication of
judicial decisions is an indispensible element of linking law with social
reality.
Stulhofer, Aleksandar (University of
Zagreb, astulhof@ffzg.hr)
Joint paper with
Ivan Landripet & Ivan Rimac
Trust in the EU: The Case of Croatia 1995 - 2003
The paper
offers an empirical analysis of the dynamics and correlates of trust in the EU
in Croatia during the 1995-2003 period. The authors use data from three studies
carried out on national probability samples (World Values Survey – Croatia 1995,
European Values Survey – Croatia 1999, and the South East European Social Survey
Project, 2003) to separate structural (human capital, social capital, standard
of living) from situational predictors of local trust in the EU. The findings
point out the importance of both.
Svyetlov, Oleksandr (Technische
Universität Berlin, Germany,
a.svetlov@web.de)
Explaining the EU
Enlargement
I analyse the
decision of the European Union to expand to Central and Eastern Europe and ask
why the EU opened accession negotiations with CEE
countries from
1998 on.
The analysis is guided by debate between rationalist and sociological approaches
to the study of international institutions in the International Relations
discipline.
The opening of accession negotiations with CEE countries
surprised
many rationalists. A rationalist cost-benefit analysis shows that Eastern
enlargement cannot be accounted for as a result of selfish and instrumental
choice by the EU member states. In a neorealist, power-based perspective, it is
neither necessary nor useful for balancing purposes. From a neoliberal,
interest-based viewpoint, Eastern enlargement is also hard to explain because
the expected costs of full CEE membership exceed the expected benefits for the
EU.
This thesis also advances hypotheses linking specific European institutions to changes
in agent preferences, with my concern being to explore the pathways and
mechanisms through which such shifts occur.
A micro-, process- and agency-based argument on the nature of social interaction
within institutions
will be
developed.
Committees
of the Council of Europe were examined empirically, asking whether the preferences and
interests of social agents were changed as issues were discussed and debated.
Much
of the literature downplays such dynamics and offers macro-historical or
macro-sociological arguments on the preference-shaping influence of European
institutions instead. Unfortunately these studies simply assert correlations
that fail to specify the causal pathways connecting European institutions to
preference change.
The 'raw material'
is drawn from
my
two
related
projects.
The first
examines the evolution and diffusion of new
civil norms in post-1989
Europe. It
consists of the
study of
new normative understandings, and country
research on
Germany,
Poland
and Ukraine.
The
second
is a
project
on international
institutions
and socialisation in the New Europe.
It
explores both micro-socialization dynamics (within EU institutions) and macro
socialization in Eastern Europe and the former
USSR.
Vidacak, Igor (Institute for
International Relations, Croatia, ividacak@irmo.hr)
Exploring Routes
of Influence of Croatian Business Actors in Brussels
This paper
analyzes how Croatian business actors respond to the challenges of interest
representation at the EU level and seeks to explore what are the main routes
of influence of Croatian companies in
Brussels.
The multi-level governance and a very complex architecture of policy-making in
the EU require a dramatic shift in patterns of interest intermediation as well
as a thorough redefinition of lobbying strategies of Croatian companies.
Drawing on the experiences of chosen business interest groups from new EU
Member States in regard to lobbying in a new, very competitive environment of
the enlarged EU, but also on the interviews with representatives of some of
the strongest Croatian companies and business associations, the paper will
attempt to answer some of the following questions: what is the EU-effect on
the patterns of Croatian business interests representation, which direct or
indirect 'lobbying channels' are available for Croatian business actors in
Brussels, what are the major obstacles and opportunities of hiring
professional lobbyist agencies or opening its own representative office in
Brussels and to what extent Croatian companies are ready to adopt a new,
multidimensional, multi-level pattern of interest representation.
Welch, Anthony
(acwelch@aol.com)
A Successful
Stability Pact: European Union Policy in South East Europe
The paper
will begin with an overview of the work undertaken thus far, including
progress under the Stability Pact, since the end of the Bosnia and Kosovo
conflicts, in order to demonstrate how this effort is now tailing off, even
before the region has stabilised and found its place in the post-conflict
world. It will then examine how failures in policy will widen the chasm
between the EU Member States (including those bordering the Balkans) and the
Balkan States.
The paper will round up with an examination of the Security Pact, its
implementation in South East Europe and the effect on security in the Balkans
and the EU. It will examine how changes in the aims and objectives of the
Stability Pact and the EU approach to reconstruction and development may
assist security and stability in an enlarged Europe in future years.
Whitaker, Richard (University of
Leicester, rcw11@leicester.ac.uk)
The Impact of
MEPs from the New Member States: An Initial Assessment
This paper
will assess the positions held by and the activities of Members of the
European Parliament (MEPs) from the ten new member states during their first
year of membership. Previous research on the European Parliament’s (EP)
internal organisation suggests that no strict system of seniority operates and
therefore new MEPs are able to obtain important positions in the EP either as
members of prestigious committees or even as committee chairs. This paper will
therefore use data from the EP’s List of Members to examine the extent
to which MEPs from the new member states are represented proportionally in the
EP’s committee system and among other offices within the parliament. The paper
will also consider the committee activities of these new MEPs by looking at
the amount and type of rapporteurships they have been allocated during their
first year in the EP. The aim is to gain an initial impression of the impact
made by MEPs from the new member states in the EP’s legislative activities.
Wilk, Katarzyna (Yale University,
USA, katarzyna.wilk@yale.edu)
How do the
Post-communist Multiple Transitions Influence Individuals’ Attitudes towards
European Integration? The Effects of Gender, Generation, Social Class, and
Political Values
In early
1990s, in addition to the complex post-communist transformation process,
Poland, Hungary, Slovakia, Slovenia, the Czech Republic, and the Baltic States
have initiated the process of integration with the European Union. Membership
in the EU became a challenge in these countries where double or triple
post-communist transition have included shifts from authoritarian regime to
democracy, from state controlled to free market economy, and in some
instances, movement form the lack of sovereignty towards nation-state. Both,
the multiple transitions and integration with the European Union have required
adjustments on the national and individual levels.
However, unlike post communist systemic transformation, which did not require
majority approval, integration with the EU became a controversial issue, of
which the final outcome was depended upon citizens’ voting in national
referenda. In the pre-accession period, therefore, European integration became
a significant issue of political parties’ campaigns as a venue of gaining
electorate. Most importantly, the prospective EU membership became a
significant element of various national policies, which created distinct
opportunity structures for different social groups, considerably affected
individuals’ lives and shaped their attitudes towards European integration.
Embedded in multiple transitions, the post-communist countries’ membership in
the EU presents theoretical and empirical opportunity to examine citizens’
support for the European integration. Existent theories on attitudes towards
the EU do not take into account the uniqueness of the post-communist
societies’ pre-accession situation. Empirical studies mainly cover old member
states, which did not experience multiple transitions on the scale of the
post-communist transition. An importance of examination attitudes towards
European integration in the post-communist societies stems from the fact that
citizens’ positions with this regard create political foundation for the
institutional base of the united Europe, shaping it through mass political
behavior. Thus, the knowledge about these attitudes and their determinants
allows one predicting how participation of newly admitted states may affect
the future integration process.
This research aims at providing a complex perspective on determinants and
mechanisms of creation attitudes towards the EU at the time of accession. On
the country level, opinions about the EU are analyzed as a result of multiple
transitions, taking into account their sequence. On the individual level,
attitudes towards European integration are viewed as outcomes of interplay
between gender, generation, social class, and political values.
This research combines both quantitative and qualitative methods. On the basis
of the European Social Survey data set, I contrast determinants of attitudes
toward European integration for such countries as Hungary and Poland with
those for the core of European Union, and latecomers. I mainly use the
structural equation modeling for this purpose. However, for studying the
mechanism of the influence of gender, generation, social class, and political
values, I plan to conduct focus group interviews for selected categories of
respondents in Hungary (Budapest) and Poland (Warsaw). In addition to the
results of advanced cross-national quantitative data analyses, I intend to
present preliminary results from conducted in Budapest and Warsaw focus group
interviews.
Last modified:
Thursday, 01 September 2005
idD410501ProgrammeR3 +10Mar2005
©UACES 2005